banner image
menu bttom
thismonth
June 2006
Legal Professional Privilege: Advisors should be careful not to waive LPP

Maddocks The legal information and commentary on this site is general only. Documents ordered through Cleardocs affect the user‘s legal rights and liabilities. To assess their suitability for the user, legal, accounting and financial advice must be obtained.

Lawyer in Profile
Bernie O'SullivanBernie O'Sullivan
Partner of Maddocks
Phone: 03 9288 0555

Bernie specialises in all areas of superannuation, managed investments, trusts and estate and business succession planning.

Before joining Maddocks Bernie was a senior associate in the Melbourne office of Mallesons Stephen Jaques. Prior to this he was State Manager, New South Wales, for a major trustee company.

Bernie has a unique combination of extensive practical experience in the marketing and sale of financial and trust services as well as a thorough understanding of the legislation underpinning such services. Bernie specialises primarily in superannuation and managed investments and succession planning and trusts.

Bernie advises leading financial institutions, statutory trustee companies, superannuation fund trustees, accountants, financial advisers and high net worth individuals.

Bernie is secretary of the ASFA Compliance Discussion Group (Victoria), a member of the Taxation Institute of Australia's Education Committee (Victoria), chair of the Securities Institute of Australia's Graduate Diploma taskforce 'Risk Management and Estate Planning'. He is a lecturer and examiner for the Securities Institute and presents extensively for the Taxation Institute of Australia, Financial Planning Association and Australian Society of CPA's on topics such as superannuation, business and estate succession planning and trust law developments.

Maddocks
Professional advisers who receive legal advice should be cautious when making statements that refer to the advice — or they risk losing the protection of legal professional privilege.
Bookmark and Share
Google-Translate-Chinese (Simplified) BETA Google-Translate-English to French Google-Translate-English to German Google-Translate-English to Italian Google-Translate-English to Japanese BETA Google-Translate-English to Korean BETA Google-Translate-English to Russian BETA Google-Translate-English to Spanish

Professional advisers face potential legal liabilities in the course of their business and may need to obtain legal advice. A recent court decision shows that revealing the fact that you have received advice and disclosing the "gist" of that advice will likely amount to a waiver of legal professional privilege.

Legal professional privilege: the benefit

Legal professional privilege ?Äòattaches' to confidential communications, whether oral or written, between a client and their lawyer if the purpose of the communication was to obtain legal advice in relation to existing or contemplated litigation.

The effect of the privilege is that the neither the client nor the lawyer can be forced to disclose the contents of the communication — unless the client has waived privilege in some way. A client can waive privilege by consenting to the disclosure or by voluntarily revealing the communication to another person (whether or not they realise the disclosure waives the privilege).

The case

The decision in Seven Network Ltd v News Ltd (No 12) [2006] FCA 348 concerned a report belonging to Optus called the "Project Alchemy Board Paper". The paper contained a section headed 'Legal Risks' which included the statement:

Our legal advice is that the risk of damages being awarded against Optus is low.

Optus was before the court objecting to a court requirement that Optus provide the court with a copy of the legal advice referred to in the paper. Optus argued that it had only waived legal professional privilege in relation to the document itself, and not the legal advice the document referred to.

The decision

The Federal Court of Australia:

  • concluded that Optus had voluntarily disclosed the 'gist', or the conclusion, of the legal advice referred to in the document
  • held that this disclosure was inconsistent with Optus maintaining its legal professional privilege; and
  • ordered Optus to release documents relating to the advice referred to in the statement.

Tips for professional advisers

Advisers need to remember that, if possible, they should not publicly announce the conclusion of any legal advice they receive — otherwise, they may prejudice their ability to claim privilege in the future. If an announcement cannot be avoided, then it is best to state only that they have sought the advice (and not disclose the 'gist' of the advice, or its conclusions).

Bookmark and Share

Register - start now New user? Register & login for FREE

To set up on Cleardocs, all you need to do is key in your name, industry, email and password. Then you're ready to create Cleardocs documents. It only takes a few minutes. (There's no joining fee. Just a pay per use document fee.)


Existing users wanting to start a new document, log in (top right)