|
|
September 2008
Tax free redundancy payments - even for directors closing a business
|
Lawyer in Profile Julian SmithSenior Associate Phone: 03 9288 0555 Julian's areas of practice include:
He has experience in drafting various types of commercial agreements, trust deeds and corporate governance documents. He also advises extensively on companies law, financial services (and licensing) and superannuation matters. Julian is studying his Masters of Law at Melbourne University and recently addressed an ICAA conference on "SMSFs: The Virtue of A Good Deed".
Payments to terminated employees can be tax free in some circumstances — including for directors who close the company's business and bring their own employment to an end. The ATO has given its interim view on what is required for these payments to be a 'genuine redundancy payment' which can be tax free.
Paul Ellis
What is the Draft Ruling about?A new draft ATO ruling clarifies when a genuine redundancy payment can be tax free (up to the relevant limit). The limit is worked out under section 83—170 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997. The ATO's views in the Draft Ruling apply to many different circumstances. Of particular interest to some ClearLaw readers will be the tax treatment of payments to company directors who decide to sell, or close down, the company's business and so bring their own employment to an end. The ruling is in Draft Taxation Ruling TR 2008/D6 (Draft Ruling). What are the requirements for a payment to be a genuine redundancy payment?There are 4 requirements for a genuine redundancy payment:
What sort of "dismissal" will qualify?The ATO's view is that the dismissal of the employee:
How are directors etc. are treated? ("dual capacity employees")As a director (or any "dual capacity employee") a person can often influence the decision as to whether their own employment should be terminated. This potential to influence the decision threatens the requirement discussed above, that the termination must be without the employee's consent. However, the ATO considers that if the employer's act or decision that leads to the termination is dictated by legal or economic compulsion, then the dismissal will be a valid dismissal and the payment will be treated as a genuine redundancy. The ATO gives a number of examples in which it indicates whether a director's (or other dual capacity employee's) participation in a decision to terminate his or her employment will or won't result in a genuine redundancy. The ATO's examples make it clear that:
Further conditionsThere are further conditions for a genuine redundancy, which must be kept in mind. Particularly relevant to a dual capacity employee is the arm's length requirement — the termination payment must not be more than could reasonably be expected in an arm's length relationship. Normally the arm's length limit on a payment would be the amount of redundancy payments the employee is entitled to under the law. — But the employer may still be able to pay an ex gratia tax free redundancy payment as a genuine redundancy payment if:
However, if the employee receives a payment that is greater than what could be expected, then the whole payment is disqualified from being a genuine redundancy payment. CommentsThe ATO has invited comments on the Draft Ruling to the ATO by 10 October 2008.
To set up on Cleardocs, all you need to do is key in your name, industry, email and password. Then you're ready to create Cleardocs documents. It only takes a few minutes. (There's no joining fee. Just a pay per use document fee.) Existing users wanting to start a new document, log in (top right) |