Welcome to the BETA version of cleardocs.
Switch back to classic

This article is more than 24 months old and is now archived. This article has not been updated to reflect any changes to the law.

clearlaw

Business Structures in 2007: An eventful year in review — issues for you and your clients to consider

Two cases during 2007 aptly illustrated the need for joint venturers to carefully document their relationship — in particular, whether fiduciary duties apply between the parties as they would in a partnership. The Cleardocs Team at Maddocks

In Farah v Say-Dee, the High Court appeared to assume that fiduciary duties applied to the relationship — despite the parties having agreed that it was a joint venture.

In ASIC v Citigroup, the Victorian Supreme Court confirmed that parties can expressly 'contract out' of fiduciary duties — including in documents such as joint venture agreements.

These cases remind practitioners that they cannot rely on the assumption that fiduciary duties do not apply to joint venturers — even so, express contractual terms can address the issues adequately.

For a more detailed summary of the cases and the differences between partnerships and joint ventures, see our full article here.

 

Lawyer in Profile

Geoff Musgrove
Geoff Musgrove
Partner
PH: 61 3 9258 3530

Geoff Musgrove is a partner in the Maddocks Commercial team.

Geoff's principal areas of practice are:

  • commercial contracts;
  • mergers, acquisitions and disposals;
  • joint ventures;
  • intellectual property and information technology law;
  • corporate law;
  • business restructuring and insolvency; and
  • franchising.

Geoff acts for a wide range of commercial, government, accounting, manufacturing, professional and rural industry clients.