Australia’s Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing (AML/CTF) Tranche 2 reforms are not policy ideas or guidance notes — they are grounded in formal legislation passed by Parliament and supported by binding rules and detailed government analysis. If you’re looking for the “why”, the legal authority, and the policy reasoning behind the changes, it starts with one key law.
Cleardocs TeamThe Anti‑Money Laundering and Counter‑Terrorism Financing Amendment Act 2024 (Amendment Act) was passed by the Australian Parliament on 29 November 2024 and received Royal Assent in December 2024.
This Act amends the original AML/CTF Act[1] significantly expanding Australia’s anti‑money laundering framework.
Most importantly, the Act formally extends AML/CTF obligations to persons and entities which provide a broader range of ‘designated services’
These include certain services which are provided by:
These ‘designated non-financial businesses and professions’ are referred to as ‘DNFBPs’.
The Amendment Act was introduced to ensure Australia’s AML/CTF regime can effectively deter, detect and disrupt money laundering and terrorism financing, and to bring Australia into line with international standards set by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF).
The Department of Home Affairs (Department) has identified three key objectives of the Amendment Act[2], which are to:
According to the Department, without reform, Australia’s AML/CTF regime would become increasingly ineffective in addressing modern money laundering risks.
AUSTRAC and Home Affairs consistently refer to professions such as accountants and lawyers as “gatekeepers” — trusted advisers who sit at critical entry points to the financial system.
International risk assessments have shown that criminals frequently misuse professional services to:
The Amendment Act responds to these risks by regulating specific services, not entire professions — meaning obligations apply only when a business provides a designated service.
The Amendment Act forms part of a broader, staged reform program.
Under the legislation:
This phased approach reflects government consultation feedback and recognises that many professional firms are engaging with AML/CTF obligations for the first time.
The Explanatory Memorandum and Bills Digest (published alongside the legislation) provide important context to how and why the law was designed.[3]
These materials explain:
AUSTRAC guidance reinforces that compliance is assessed on effectiveness, not paperwork alone.
From a legal standpoint, the Amendment Act removes uncertainty.
If a business provides a designated service with a geographical link to Australia, AML/CTF compliance becomes a statutory obligation, not a best‑practice choice.
For accountants and lawyers, this legislation establishes AML/CTF compliance as:
The AML/CTF Tranche 2 reforms are firmly grounded in legislation, international standards, and documented risk assessments.
The Amendment Act provides the legal authority behind the reforms — and makes clear why professional advisers now play a formal role in protecting Australia’s financial system.
In the next article, we’ll move from legislation to how AML/CTF obligations work in practice, including what firms are expected to implement before 1 July 2026.
[1] Anti Money Laundering and Counter Terrorism Act 2006 (Cth)
[2] https://www.homeaffairs.gov.au/criminal-justice/Pages/overview-of-the-amlctf-amendment-act.aspx
[3] https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Bills_Legislation/Bills_Search_Results/Result?bId=r7243
The legal information and commentary on this site is general only. Documents ordered through Cleardocs affect the user's legal rights and liabilities. To assess their suitability for the user, legal accounting and financial advice must be obtained.