Historically, ASIC did not permit electronic signatures on a number of its forms. However, this changed from 1 October 2025: ASIC now allows electronic signing across most forms. This is part of its commitment to streamline and simplify its regulatory process.
While ASIC has mostly shifted to electronic execution, it is a timely reminder for users to make important considerations when adopting electronic signatures, including when physical (‘wet ink’) signatures may remain preferable and ensuring electronic executions comply with ASIC’s requirements.
This article summarises when electronic execution may be accepted, ASIC’s approach to electronic signing, and provides practical guidance on some of the scenarios where ‘wet ink’ may still be appropriate.
Chris Wright, Maddocks LawyersAcceptance of electronic signatures on all ASIC forms:
From 1 October 2025, ASIC now supports the use of electronic signatures on all ASIC forms that contain an approved PDF format, including Form 362 (used to appoint a registered agent in Australia to deal with ASIC on a company’s behalf, or to end the appointment).
While ASIC has stipulated that electronic signatures are accepted across its forms, it is important to confirm that the specific form you are lodging permits electronic execution before proceeding.
Ancillary documents to ASIC forms:
Although ASIC accepts electronic signatures on its own forms, ancillary documents attached to those forms may require physical (‘wet ink’) signatures. For example:
While signing electronically is generally permissible for individuals, Australian companies,[1] and other Australian entities, it is important to note that this must be considered on case by case basis.
Laws vary by State or Territory and depend on the type of document being executed. For example, in Queensland, the Electronic Transactions (Queensland) Act 2001 (Qld) permits certain forms of electronic execution in Queensland but excludes certain transactions under Schedule 1 of that Act, such as where a person is required to file a document with a court or tribunal.
For ASIC forms, ASIC specifies two accepted methods for electronic signing, being:
Even where electronic signing is permissible, it is important to consider using ‘wet ink’ signatures in the following instances:
If a document is invalidly executed, it may render a document invalid, potentially making any obligations, arrangements or protections under the document unenforceable.
If you are unsure as to whether a document can be signed electronically, you should seek independent legal advice before signing the relevant documents.
Cleardocs offers the following products, among others:
Please read the Product Benefits, Product Information and Frequently Asked Legal Questions carefully and consider if it is appropriate in your circumstances before purchasing any Cleardocs product.
For more information, contact Maddocks on (03) 9258 3555 and ask to speak to a member of the Commercial team.
[1]Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 127.
[2]Duties Act 1997 (NSW) s 58(2A).

Qualifications: LLB (Hons), BCom, University of Melbourne
Andrew is a Partner in Maddocks Tax and Structuring team. He has significant experience in advising Australian and multinational companies, high net worth individuals, accountants and financial advisers on all areas of taxation law.
Andrew regularly provides advice on:
His advice covers both direct and indirect tax considerations.
The legal information and commentary on this site is general only. Documents ordered through Cleardocs affect the user's legal rights and liabilities. To assess their suitability for the user, legal accounting and financial advice must be obtained.