ASIC has reported a significant rise in misconduct exploiting superannuation savings, driven by economic pressures and opportunistic business models. The regulator has observed a surge in misleading advertising, aggressive sales tactics, and inappropriate financial advice, particularly in relation to SMSFs and property investment schemes.
These issues were highlighted in a recent Federal Court case[1] in which a financial services provider was fined over $11 million for breaching conflicted remuneration laws and giving inappropriate advice to clients in relation to their superannuation.
In response, ASIC is ramping up enforcement, issuing public warnings, and increasing scrutiny of advisers and trustees to better protect consumers and maintain the integrity of the superannuation system.
This article provides an overview of the key trends in superannuation-related misconduct, ASIC’s enforcement priorities, and practical steps for trustees, advisers, and consumers.
Lucy MacLachlan, Maddocks LawyersASIC released its latest annual report on 8 October 2025, outlining its activities and regulatory focus from 1 July 2024 to 30 June 2025.[2] A key focus for ASIC over the past year has been tackling the exploitation of superannuation, including in respect of SMSFs. The report details a range of improper practices ASIC has targeted, as well as certain systemic issues which ASIC intends to address through ongoing regulatory action.
In April 2025, the Federal Court imposed an $11.03 million penalty on DOD Bookkeeping Pty Ltd (formerly Equiti Financial Services) following ASIC proceedings. The company was found to have breached conflicted remuneration laws and provided generic financial “cookie-cutter” advice that failed to consider clients’ individual circumstances. ASIC’s investigation revealed bonuses paid to advisers were linked to property purchases through a related entity, influencing advice and undermining client interests. The Federal Court described the conduct as systemic and deliberate, with ASIC cancelling the company’s financial services licence in November 2024.
ASIC’s report makes it clear that both consumers and industry participants have a role to play in safeguarding superannuation. Australians are encouraged to seek independent financial advice, ask questions, and be cautious of offers that seem too good to be true - especially when it comes to SMSFs and high-risk investment schemes. Trustees and financial advisers should critically review their practices to ensure they are meeting their legal obligations and acting in the best interests of members and clients, as ASIC’s enforcement and regulatory scrutiny in this area will continue
Cleardocs offer the following relevant products:
Please read the Product Benefits, Product Information and Frequently Asked Legal Questions carefully and consider if it is appropriate in your circumstances before purchasing any Cleardocs product.
For more information, contact Maddocks on (03) 9288 0555 and ask to speak to a member of the Commercial team.
[1]Australian Securities and Investments Commission v DOD Bookkeeping Pty Ltd (in liq), in the matter of DOD Bookkeeping Pty Ltd (in liq) (No 2) [2025] FCA 395. You can read the full case here.
[2] Australian Securities & Investments Commission Annual Report 2024 – 25. You can read the full report here.

Qualifications: BA (Philosophy), Monash University, JD (Juris Doctor), University of Melbourne
Jack is a member of Maddocks Commercial team. He advises a range of corporate and private clients on:
Jack acts for clients on both buy-side and sell-side and specialises in founder-owned businesses and Australian subsidiaries of multi-national companies. He works across a number of sectors including information technology, professional services, and property development and management including land lease.
Jack's structuring work includes assisting multinationals to structure Australian operations, listed companies to achieve regulatory compliance / optimisation and providing general tax structuring. He has also represented clients in tax controversies including before the General Anti-Avoidance Review Panel (GAAR Panel) and the Federal Court of Australia.
 
                    The legal information and commentary on this site is general only. Documents ordered through Cleardocs affect the user's legal rights and liabilities. To assess their suitability for the user, legal accounting and financial advice must be obtained.