This article is more than 24 months old and is now archived. This article has not been updated to reflect any changes to the law.

clearlaw

Ending and starting SMSF pensions: the ATO's view on apportioning pension components

Should the trustee(s) of an SMSF completely recalculate the tax-free and taxable portions of a member's superannuation interest when:

  • the pension member has 'rolled back' their pension into accumulation phase: and
  • later decided to recommence a pension using the same superannuation entitlements?

The ATO's view is that 'yes', the portions need to be recalculated.

Nick Sulman

Summary: the need to recalculate

On 8 December 2010, the NTLG Superannuation Technical Sub-Group discussed the application of the 'proportioning rule' that applies when a pension has been ended and then later recommenced by a member of an SMSF. The relevant law is in section 307-125 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (Tax Act).

The Group put this situation to the ATO:

  1. The member of an SMSF converts their superannuation pension back into accumulation phase. (Usually, this is done to avoid 'drawing down' any more of the superannuation entitlements and to allow the SMSF to avoid realising any large losses.)
  2. Consequently, the SMSF loses the pension asset exemption on those assets, which were being used to support the payment of the member's pension.
  3. The member does not make any contributions to the SMSF while it is back in accumulation phase.
  4. However, in that period, the SMSF may have received some income and other earnings.
  5. The member decides to start a new pension.

In response, the ATO confirmed that the SMSF trustee must recalculate the tax-free and taxable portions of a member's superannuation interest of the new pension which is to be paid.

What's the current law?

The Tax Act [i] ensures that the tax free component and taxable component of a superannuation benefit are calculated by:

  • first, determining the proportions of the value of the superannuation interest that those components represent; and
  • next, applying those proportions to the benefit.

The Tax Act [ii] then deals with apportioning each superannuation benefit payment. For example:

  • Assume that the SMSF is to pay a superannuation lump sum of $100.
  • Just before the benefit is paid, the value of the superannuation interest from which the lump sum will be paid was $1,000.
  • Of that $1,000, the tax free component is $200 and the taxable component is $800.
  • Then, when the lump sum is paid, those same proportions are applied to the lump sum.  So — for the lump sum  —  the tax free component is $20 and the taxable component is $80.

The effect of these provisions is that the SMSF can't just:

  • pay out all of the taxable component; and
  • then fund the remaining payments from the tax free component.

(But for these provisions, that would be a nifty way to reduce the tax payable on any later death benefit – because those death benefits would be paid from tax free components and would be subject to less tax when paid to the beneficiary.)

Issues

In the above scenario, the biggest compliance challenge facing the SMSF trustee is how to calculate the tax-free and taxable components of the member's superannuation interest, at the time the new pension starts.

The question is whether:

  • the trustee of the SMSF calculate the tax free and taxable components of the pension without regard to the original proportions calculated with the original pension; or
  • the trustee needs to include these proportions when applying the proportioning rule for the new pension.

What does the ATO say?

The ATO's National Tax Liaison Group minutes record the ATO's response as follows:

  • If a member of an SMSF fully commutes their pension, then the trustee must recalculate the tax-free and the taxable component of any new benefit subsequently paid from the fund, in accordance with the Tax Act.
  • This requirement arises because the full commutation of the pension changes the member's superannuation interest in the SMSF from one that was supporting a superannuation income stream to a new accumulation interest.

Possible Interpretations

Under a literal interpretation the trustee(s) of the SMSF are required to completely recalculate the tax-free and taxable proportions at the start of the new pension, without regard to those proportions that were applied to the original pension.

Under a more flexible interpretation the taxpayer must return to the original tax-free and taxable components that were calculated at the commencement of the first pension, and these proportions need to be taken into account when determining the proportioning rule of the new pension.

As set out above, the ATO prefers the literal interpretation.

More information from Maddocks

For more information, contact Maddocks on (03) 9288 0555 and ask for a member of the Maddocks Superannuation or Tax and Revenue Team.

More Cleardocs information on related topics

You can read earlier ClearLaw articles on a wide range of SMSF topics here.

Related links

http://www.ato.gov.au/taxprofessionals/content.asp?doc=/content/00268544.htm

More Cleardocs information on SMSFs

Order SMSF related document packages

Download

Download a checklist of the information you need to order a document package.


[i] Section 307-125(1)

[ii] Section 307-125(2)

 

Lawyer in Profile

Jack Coventry
Jack Coventry
Senior Associate
+61 3 9258 3819
jack.coventry@maddocks.com.au

Qualifications: BA (Philosophy), Monash University, JD (Juris Doctor), University of Melbourne

Jack is a member of Maddocks Commercial team. He advises a range of corporate and private clients on:

  • M&A transactions,
  • corporate reorganisations, and
  • legal and tax structuring.

Jack acts for clients on both buy-side and sell-side and specialises in founder-owned businesses and Australian subsidiaries of multi-national companies. He works across a number of sectors including information technology, professional services, and property development and management including land lease.

Jack’s structuring work includes assisting multinationals to structure Australian operations, listed companies to achieve regulatory compliance / optimisation and providing general tax structuring. He has also represented clients in tax controversies including before the General Anti-Avoidance Review Panel (GAAR Panel) and the Federal Court of Australia.

Read Our Latest Articles