This article is more than 24 months old and is now archived. This article has not been updated to reflect any changes to the law.

clearlaw

Minimum Annual Pension Payment Requirements: To pay or not to pay — that is the question

Trustees of self managed superannuation funds (SMSFs) need to ensure that the pensions the SMSF pays meet the relevant regulatory requirements — including the minimum annual pension payment requirement. Otherwise, the SMSF's may not be able to claim a current pension income deduction for the pensions it is paying. Robert Green

Changes to tax law mean that for an SMSF to claim the current pension income deduction, the SMSF must be paying a pension that complies strictly with the SIS regulations [1] — including meeting minimum annual pension payments. This topic was discussed at a recent meeting of the National Tax Liaison Group (NTLG) in the context of the recent amendments to the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA).

The current position, and some relief for SMSFs

The current position is that minimum annual pension payments must be made in the year in which they become payable (for the SMSF to claim a current pension income deduction).

Even so, there has been some relief for SMSFs struggling to make minimum annual pension payments. The SIS Regulations have been amended to halve the minimum payment amounts for account-based pensions in the 2008-09 and 2009-10 financial years. SMSF trustee(s) need to consult their advisor about the implications for their SMSF.

Why is this issue of particular relevance at present?

Not surprisingly, ensuring that minimum annual pension payments are being made is of particular importance given the impact the global financial crisis and economic downturn have had on the balances of many SMSFs' pension accounts.

What is the 'current pension income deduction'

SMSFs may claim as a deduction all ordinary and statutory income derived from assets set aside to pay a pension[2]. To claim this deduction, the pension must comply with all the regulatory requirements for pensions under regulation 1.06 of the SIS Regulations. For present purposes, this includes the requirement that the annual minimum pension payment be made in the relevant year.

The view of the NTLG and the ATO

The view of the NTLG is that SMSFs should be able:

  • to underpay the minimum payments in one year,
  • but with an obligation to make up those underpayments in the following year (or years) — presumably without affecting the SMSFs ability to claim a current pension income deduction.

Although the ATO's initial view is that SMSFs cannot act in this way, it is currently considering the implications of failing to make minimum annual pension payments in the context of the current pension income deduction under the ITAA.

At least for the moment, SMSF trustee(s) wishing to claim the current pension income deduction must ensure that all pension amounts are paid in the year in which they are due.

The ITAA and the SIS Regulations

The NLTG noted the following:

  • To gain the current pension income deduction under the ITAA, the pension must comply with all requirements in r.1.06 of the SIS Regulations;
  • These requirements include the minimum pension amount specified in r.1.06;
  • It is not enough for the rules to state that a pension must be paid in a particular year: the whole of the pension payment must, in fact, be made in that year;
  • A pension in breach of r.1.06 for underpayment will not be remedied by paying the accrued amount in the following year; and
  • Accordingly, the SMSF will not be entitled to claim the current pension income deduction.

SMSF pensions and the Global Financial Crisis

The ATO states its position regarding minimum annual pension payments and the economic downturn as follows:

If your fund fails to meet its minimum pension payment due to factors beyond your control, like being unable to liquidate assets due to current economic conditions despite taking all reasonable steps, it's generally unlikely that an offence against the operating standards in the super laws will occur.

How this approach would apply to individual circumstances is unclear. For example, will the ATO require SMSFs to liquidate shares at a major loss in order to meet pension payments?

Regardless, the ATO's position is that if minimum annual pension payments are not made, then the SMSF cannot claim the current pension income deduction. Until the ATO reconsiders its position or the legislation is amended, SMSF trustees should comply strictly with the ATO's view.

More information from Maddocks

For more information, contact Maddocks on (03) 9288 0555 and ask for a member of the Maddocks Superannuation Team.

More Cleardocs information on SMSFs — www.cleardocs.com

Read

You can read earlier ClearLaw articles on a wide range of SMSF topics here.

Order SMSF related document packages

Set up an SMSF
Update an SMSF deed
Set up an SMSF pension

Arrange SMSF borrowing lending docs:

Set up an SMSF corporate trustee

SMSF Death Benefit Nomination — binding or non-binding
An SMSF Death Benefit Agreement — binding and permanent

Download checklist

Download a checklist of the information you need to order a document package.


[1] Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Regulations 1994 (SIS Regulations).

[2] Section 295-385 of the ITAA

 

Lawyer in Profile

Leigh Baring
Leigh Baring
Partner
+61 3 9258 3673
leigh.baring@maddocks.com.au

Qualifications: LLB (Hons), BEc (Hons), Monash University

Leigh is a Partner in Maddocks Tax and Structuring team. Leigh has extensive experience in advising Australian and multinational companies, high net worth individuals, accountants and financial advisers on all areas of taxation law.

Leigh regularly provides advice on:

  • structuring of businesses and transactions,
  • mergers and acquisitions,
  • corporate reorganisations and distributions,
  • sale of businesses,
  • demergers,
  • capital raisings,
  • joint ventures and property developments,
  • international tax (both inbound and outbound), and
  • succession planning and liquidations.

His advice covers both direct and indirect tax considerations.

Throughout his career, Leigh has been at the forefront in developing tax-effective corporate, trust and superannuation structures.

Read Our Latest Articles