This article is more than 24 months old and is now archived. This article has not been updated to reflect any changes to the law.
Super law is always changing, and recent changes resulting from the Hayne Royal Commission have important implications for people’s insurance.
The changes particularly affect:
Essentially, the changes means insurance through super becomes available only on an opt-in basis – rather than an opt-out basis. For people who already have insurance, there are important steps to take to make sure that insurance continues.
Bridie O'Shannessy, Maddocks LawyersChanges to super law earlier this year[1] mean that funds must not provide members[2] with insurance if:
Those funds must provide members with insurance inactivity notices when their accounts have been inactive, alerting members that if their funds continue to be inactive then that insurance will cease to be provided.
The proposed legislation[3] means that super funds must not provide members with insurance if:
unless the member has elected in writing that they be provided with an insurance product.
In respect of existing members, the fund must provide written notice if the member has a super account balance of less than $6,000 which states that after 1 October 2019[4] insurance will not be provided to the member unless the member elects to have insurance. However, if the member has already elected to have insurance the super fund does not have to provide the notice.
The rationale for the changes is that members with low balances, members under 25, and members whose accounts are inactive for long periods often have their super savings eroded by insurance premiums and fees charged by their super fund, as insurance provided as a default product will often be inappropriate for the member and therefore provides no real value.
Members should keep an eye out for correspondence from their super funds asking them to opt-in to insurance arrangements, particularly if they are self-employed and not making regular contributions to their super or are on a leave of absence/parental leave. These members may lose insurance benefits they wish to retain.
The above changes don’t affect super funds with fewer than 5 members (ie SMSFs).
However, the changes are still material in circumstances such as those set out below:
If a person has set up an SMSF and rolled over most of their savings to that SMSF from their public offer fund, often the member will leave a small balance in the public offer fund so their insurance arrangements continue.
The member may leave enough funds behind to pay the premiums for a period (and may not make regular contributions as a result). However, under the above rules this insurance could be cancelled if the member did not opt in on receipt of a notice from their public fund.
Following the Hayne Royal Commission much has been written about the flow of funds out of retail super funds into industry super funds.
However, as in the example above, people will routinely leave a small balance behind to continue insurance coverage – including where, the person developed an illness since originally obtaining insurance cover, which would mean that they can no longer take out that insurance in their new fund.
Again, it is essential for people in these circumstances to advise the fund with their existing insurance that they wish that insurance to continue.
For more information, contact Maddocks on (03) 9258 3555 and ask to speak to a member of the Commercial team.
You can read earlier ClearLaw articles on a range of topics
[1] Treasury Laws Amendment (Protecting Your Superannuation Package) Act 2019; Treasury Laws Amendment (Protecting Your Superannuation Package) Regulations 2019.
[2] These rules don’t apply to all super fund members: eg defined benefit members.
[3] Treasury Laws Amendment (Putting Members’ Interests First Bill 2019.
[4] As the Bill is still before Parliament this date may change.
Qualifications: BCom, LLB (Hons), Monash University
Daniel is a member of Maddocks Tax and Structuring team. He has expertise advising on both direct and indirect taxes. He has represented private and publicly-listed companies, high net worth family groups and not-for-profit organisations in a broad range of tax and duty matters.
The legal information and commentary on this site is general only. Documents ordered through Cleardocs affect the user's legal rights and liabilities. To assess their suitability for the user, legal accounting and financial advice must be obtained.