This article is more than 24 months old and is now archived. This article has not been updated to reflect any changes to the law.
The ATO has released draft Practical Compliance Guideline 2016/D16 (PCG) on the Commissioner's discretion concerning when a trust entitlement will amount to a fixed trust entitlement. The draft PCG provides key insights into factors the ATO will consider in exercising the fixed trust discretion. Equally, the draft PCG's release serves as a prompt to consider the reasons why trustees or their advisors may not want a fixed trust.
Rafael Perez, Maddocks LawyersLike many trust concepts, a fixed trust does not have a single meaning. It is most useful to consider fixed trusts along a continuum.
At one end, you have a trust where the trustee holds one asset for one beneficiary, and the beneficiary can call for the asset to be distributed to them at any time. Likewise, if the trustee receives any income referable to the trust asset, it must immediately pass it on to the beneficiary.
At the other end, you have a trust where a set number of beneficiaries have a defined proportional interest in the trust assets, represented by the number of units they hold. Think of a unit trust holding a mix of shares and property. This may fit some criteria of a fixed trust because:
But a unit trust may be a long way along the continuum if the trustee can:
This article primarily explores the concept of fixed trusts in relation to the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) (ITAA36).
However the concept of a fixed trust appears elsewhere, in respect of which different definitions apply, such as:
Under the law, the Commissioner has a discretion to treat a beneficiary's entitlement as fixed.[1]
In isolation, the provision does not provide a great deal of certainty regarding the factors that will inform the Commissioner's exercise of the discretion. With the release of the draft PCG, we now have a better sense of what the Commissioner thinks the provisions mean in practice and crucially, when an interest might be regarded as not being capable of vesting or when it might be defeated.
The ATO's view is that it is difficult in practice for many trusts to satisfy the fixed trust definition, unless the Commissioner exercises the discretion.
So even though a trust may not readily be regarded as a fixed trust, the Commissioner's discretion allows for a broader category of trusts to be nonetheless regarded as fixed. The draft PCG explains the factors that the Commissioner thinks are relevant to exercising the discretion, including:
A precondition requiring the trustee to obtain unitholder consent to redeem units is expressed in the draft PCG as having a neutral impact. However, a trustee with an unlimited power to redeem units will unfavourably impact the Commissioner's exercise of the discretion.
The draft PCG includes a summary table that sets out a number of trust circumstances and how these circumstances might impact on the exercise of the Commissioner's discretion.
Classification as a fixed trust under the Commissioner's discretion can provide preferential tax treatment under a number of areas of the taxation legislation. The more common areas the discretion can affect include:
The merits of preferential tax treatment need to be weighed against a decrease in flexibility of the trust's administration and the corresponding reduction in the trustee's powers. Readers should carefully consider the following examples of restrictions that might be placed on a unit trust that is fixed or has the characteristics of a fixed trust:
For more information on whether your trust is or should be fixed, or for general structuring information, contact Maddocks on (03) 9258 3555 and ask to speak to a member of the Commercial team or the Revenue team.
You can read earlier ClearLaw articles on a range of topics.
Qualifications: BA (Philosophy), Monash University, JD (Juris Doctor), University of Melbourne
Jack is a member of Maddocks Commercial team. He advises a range of corporate and private clients on:
Jack acts for clients on both buy-side and sell-side and specialises in founder-owned businesses and Australian subsidiaries of multi-national companies. He works across a number of sectors including information technology, professional services, and property development and management including land lease.
Jack's structuring work includes assisting multinationals to structure Australian operations, listed companies to achieve regulatory compliance / optimisation and providing general tax structuring. He has also represented clients in tax controversies including before the General Anti-Avoidance Review Panel (GAAR Panel) and the Federal Court of Australia.
The legal information and commentary on this site is general only. Documents ordered through Cleardocs affect the user's legal rights and liabilities. To assess their suitability for the user, legal accounting and financial advice must be obtained.