When adding or removing a named beneficiary of a discretionary trust, it is important to know the risks associated with amending trust deeds. If the changes are of a fundamental nature, there is a risk that a new trust will be created (a 'resettlement'), potentially triggering duty and other tax consequences.
This article outlines what a trust resettlement is, the consequences of resettling your trust and the key considerations to be aware of when amending your trust deed, focusing on amendments that alter the named beneficiaries of a trust. The article also considers what other considerations trustees should bear in mind when adding or removing a beneficiary, as well as tips on how to draft your trust deed to minimise resettlement risk.
Tristram Feder, Maddocks LawyersAmending a trust deed carries a risk of 'resettlement'. The High Court of Australia has expressed that a trust is 'resettled'; when an amendment to the trust is so substantial that the trust is fundamentally changed. In FCT v Commercial Nominees (2001) and FCT v Clark (2011), the Court considered that a trust is resettled when an amendment causes a lack of 'continuum' of the trust, especially in respect of:
The Commissioner of Taxation's view in Taxation Determination TD 2012/21 is that an amendment to a trust deed will only trigger a resettlement when:
You should always consider resettlement risk when adding or removing a beneficiary from a trust, and whether that change is so substantial that it causes a lack of continuity in the trust. According to Commercial Nominees and Clark, if an amendment is within the scope of a power of variation, there may be no resettlement as the change is within the contemplation of the deed. Furthermore, if a change to beneficial entitlements is consistent with the nature or purpose of the trust, a resettlement is less likely to be triggered.
The law around resettlement is complicated and highly dependent on the particular circumstances and the nature of the trust, the trust deed, the trust property the proposed amendment. If you are concerned about resettlement risk, you should seek legal advice.
If a trust is found to be ‘resettled’ by a court or a taxing authority (for example, a state revenue office or the ATO), then it may result in:
stamp duty being payable;
When adding or removing a beneficiary from a trust, resettlement risk should be closely evaluated, especially in circumstances where:
When adding or removing a beneficiary, as when considering any deed amendment or proposed trustee action, the trust deed should be read closely. Requirements may typically include one or more of the following:
State and territory governments are increasingly changing their tax and revenue laws in ways which specifically impact trusts and the beneficiaries of trusts. They do so, on occasion, in ways which 'deem' trusts such as discretionary trusts to confer rights on beneficiaries which their deeds do not.
For instance, in Western Australia, if a beneficiary who is a taker in default ‘surrenders’ their interest in a trust that owns dutiable property (directly or indirectly), there is a deemed disposal of a proportional interest in the underlying property. For example, if a trust owns underlying dutiable property and has two named beneficiaries, and one beneficiary is removed from the trust, then this amounts to a deemed disposal of a 50% interest in the trust’s underlying dutiable property. This increases the interest in the underlying dutiable property held by the remaining named beneficiary by 50%. Duty may then be payable by the remaining beneficiary on the 50% interest that they acquire in the underlying property.
Accordingly, changes to named beneficiaries who receive distributions ‘by default’ (that is, if the trustee does not exercise discretion by a particular deadline, for example 30 June) must be very carefully considered in some jurisdictions. The change may not amount to a ‘resettlement’, but may nonetheless be deemed to be a dutiable transaction.
To minimise resettlement risk, you should consider drafting your trust deed with a broad variation power that contemplates any expected changes to the trust.
A ‘letter of wishes’, from the settlor of the trust to the trustee upon the settlement of the trust, may also be useful. The letter may convey that the trust is to be flexible and may be varied as necessary (under a power of amendment) to achieve an expressed purpose.
More information from Maddocks
For more information, contact Maddocks on (03) 9288 0555 and ask to speak to a member of the Commercial team.
More Cleardocs information on related topics
Related document packages
Qualifications: BA (Philosophy), Monash University, JD (Juris Doctor), University of Melbourne
Jack is a member of Maddocks Commercial team. He advises a range of corporate and private clients on:
Jack acts for clients on both buy-side and sell-side and specialises in founder-owned businesses and Australian subsidiaries of multi-national companies. He works across a number of sectors including information technology, professional services, and property development and management including land lease.
Jack's structuring work includes assisting multinationals to structure Australian operations, listed companies to achieve regulatory compliance / optimisation and providing general tax structuring. He has also represented clients in tax controversies including before the General Anti-Avoidance Review Panel (GAAR Panel) and the Federal Court of Australia.
The legal information and commentary on this site is general only. Documents ordered through Cleardocs affect the user's legal rights and liabilities. To assess their suitability for the user, legal accounting and financial advice must be obtained.