This article is more than 24 months old and is now archived. This article has not been updated to reflect any changes to the law.
Planning for what happens to a member's superannuation benefits on death (death benefits) is essential. A properly prepared SMSF deed is an integral part of this planning, but so is:
This article touches on some of the golden rules to observe when undertaking this planning, and highlights some of the implications if this goes wrong.
Stephanie McLennan, Maddocks LawyersPlanning for treatment of death benefits should form part of every person's estate plan. That planning can be quite involved, and requires analysis and preparation of a range of key documents. This article highlights some of the essential planning rules and objectives relevant to that process.
A member's death benefits do not form part of their personal estate. Payment of a member's death benefits is determined in accordance with the provisions of superannuation law and the SMSF's governing rules. The member's will is only relevant if:
This golden rule was stated plainly by the Superannuation Complaints Tribunal, and reiterated on appeal to the Federal Court of Australia in the decision of Mandie, that 'superannuation is not an asset of the estate and a trustee is not bound to follow the directions of a will. Even if superannuation is specifically mentioned in a will, it does not make it an asset subject to the terms of the will.' [1] You can read more about the decision in Mandie.
The legislation requires death benefits be paid to the member's dependants (spouse, children, other dependants) or 'legal personal representative' (ie. the executors of the deceased member's estate).
Accordingly, death benefits can be dealt with by the SMSF trustee:
Those death benefits paid to the estate will then be administered in accordance with the member's will.
There are a variety of means by which a member can give directions to the SMSF trustee about death benefits. These include:
Accordingly, another golden rule is that death benefits planning documents must be carefully drafted given the range of different options and the need to ensure they all work as intended under the SMSF deed.
Another recent decision (which you can read about: see Munro v Munro [2] ) is an important reminder to carefully draft these documents. That decision highlights that:
The decisions in Mandie and Munro highlight that:
If care is not taken to select a suitable person as successor to a deceased member in the role of:
then situations can arise where the SMSF is under the control of an unintended successor. That person might act in accordance with superannuation law and the SMSF deed but contrary to the wishes of the deceased member.
If member 1 has complete trust that member 2 will do all that is required to deal with the death benefits in an appropriate way, there may be no need to create any binding arrangements in respect of death benefits. Each member may be content to allow the survivor to exercise their discretion, obtain the right advice and make the correct decisions.
However all members should take the time to consider their circumstances, and the best approach. For instance the member should consider putting in place binding arrangements for the payment of their death benefits (and thereby remove the trustee's discretion):
Specific considerations for individual trustees
Arrangements for control after a member's death is somewhat complex in the case of an SMSF with individual trustees and these require careful thought.
Depending on:
arrangements may be made for the member's legal personal representative (ie. executor of their estate) to be appointed as trustee in place of a deceasedmember.
Corporate trustees
If control is a concern in the case of an SMSF with a corporate trustee, it is essential that part of the plan includes deciding who will hold the shares in the corporate trustee. This is because the shareholders have the power to appoint directors.
There is no restriction on who should be the shareholders of the corporation. Accordingly, and again depending on the extent to which the member wishes to manage control of the SMSF and its trustee after their death, arrangements for ownership of the shares in the corporate trustee should form part of the member's estate plan.
Reviewing a member's plans at different life stages is just as important for SMSF death benefits as it is for the member's broader estate plan. The critical stages where the member's plans should be reviewed include:
For example, on the death of a spouse, the surviving spouse should revisit reversionary beneficiary arrangements and consider whether, and the extent to which, death benefits will be dealt with under the member's will.
Reviewing a member's plans on commencement of the pension phase is also important because once the pension phase commences, the payment of those benefits in the event of death will be governed in the following order:
You can read more about pensions, reversionary beneficiaries and death benefits here.
Stay on top of the never ending changes affecting superannuation with the following resources from Thomson Reuters: The Essential SMSF Guide and the Australian Superannuation Handbook. Available in book, ebook and online.
For more information, contact Maddocks on (03) 9258 3555 and ask to speak to a member of the Commercial team.
You can read earlier ClearLaw articles on a range of SMSF-related topics.
Qualifications: BCom, LLB (Hons), Monash University
Alisha is a member of Maddocks Commercial team. She assists her clients in a variety of commercial matters.
Alisha has experience in:
The legal information and commentary on this site is general only. Documents ordered through Cleardocs affect the user's legal rights and liabilities. To assess their suitability for the user, legal accounting and financial advice must be obtained.