This article is more than 24 months old and is now archived. This article has not been updated to reflect any changes to the law.
ClearLaw has recently covered some of the reasons why updates may be required to SMSF deeds. These reasons may still be relevant to SMSFs in 'pension phase'. Here's why.
Emily Millane and Anna TangA Genuine Redundancy Payment[1] is defined as so much of a payment that an employee receives when they are dismissed from employment:
However, a payment made at the end of a fixed period of employment cannot normally be considered a Genuine Redundancy Payment. This is because for the payment to be characterised as a Genuine Redundancy Payment[2]:
Genuine Redundancy Payments are tax free up to a limit (Tax Free Limit). The Tax Free Limit is calculated based on the following formula (Formula):[3]
Base Amount + (Service Amount x Years of Service)
In the formula:
The amounts for each of these components are:
2007-2008 income year | 2008-2009 income year | |
---|---|---|
Base Amount | $7,020 | $7,350 |
Service Amount | $3,511 | $3,676 |
Any amount that exceeds the Tax Free Limit is taxed as an employment termination payment (ETP).[4] The current rates of taxation for ETPs are:
Age of recipient |
employment termination payment — 2008-2009 |
|
---|---|---|
Tax-free component[5] | Taxable component (that is, taxed as an ETP) | |
55 years or older | Tax free | 15% - $0-$145,000 45% - $145,0001 and above |
0-54 years | Tax free | 30% - $0-145,000 45% - $145,001 and above |
In the ruling (TR 2009/2), the Commissioner clarifies the requirements for a Genuine Redundancy Payment as:
The payment must be received in consequence of an employee's termination.
The Commissioner considers that a payment is made in consequence of the termination of the taxpayer's employment if the payment follows as an effect or result of the termination.[6]
The termination must involve the employee being dismissed from employment.
Relevant considerations include:
The dismissal must be caused by the redundancy of the employee's position.
An employee's position is redundant if the employer determines that the position is:
The redundancy payment must be made genuinely because of a redundancy.
Whether a redundancy is a 'genuine' redundancy is determined on an objective basis.
The ruling sets out the following steps that should be undertaken to determine the tax treatment of a Genuine Redundancy Payment:
Identify and exclude any amounts that are subject to a more specific tax treatment. As set out in section 82-135, these include:
For questions or more information about the above article, please call Maddocks in Melbourne (03 9288 0555) and ask for a member of the Maddocks Tax and Revenue Team.
[1]As defined in section 83-175(1) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA97)
[2]The conditions are found in section 83-175(2) of the ITAA97
[3]As set out in section 83-170(3) of the ITAA97
[4]Under section 82-135 of the ITAA97
[5]The tax-free component of an ETP comprises payments made because the employee has ceased work due to physical or mental ill-health or where that part of the payment relate to an employment period prior to July 1983 (section 82-140 of the ITAA97).
[6]More information on this topic is set out in TR 2003/13.
Qualifications: BA, LLB, Deakin University
Sophie is a member of Maddocks Commercial team. She is a corporate and commercial lawyer with a particular focus on:
She regularly assists clients across multiple sectors including consumer markets (beauty and retail), industrial (manufacturing and distribution) and financial services. Her private sector clients include multinationals, private equity funds and founders.
The legal information and commentary on this site is general only. Documents ordered through Cleardocs affect the user's legal rights and liabilities. To assess their suitability for the user, legal accounting and financial advice must be obtained.